Betting Bonuses in New Zealand 2026: The Real Cost Behind the Offer

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

New Zealand’s betting market looks nothing like the markets most “bonus” comparison sites are built for. Section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020, in force since 28 June 2025, leaves TAB NZ and its online sister Betcha as the only providers lawfully taking online sports and racing bets from people in New Zealand. Every offshore welcome offer a New Zealand punter sees in an inbox or a banner sits behind that single fact, and the maths of “bonus” stops looking like the marketing when the page below it walks through what TAB NZ’s Bonus Cash actually takes to clear.

The angle of this guide is cost — what a sign-up package, a free bet or a “boosted odds” token returns to a real punter, not what its headline says. The mechanics of an offer are universal; the law, the operator set and the harm-minimisation frame around them are New Zealand’s own.

Current as of 26 October 2026 — checked against the Racing Industry Act 2020 (section 74AAA), TAB NZ and Betcha app listings, and the Department of Internal Affairs gambling framework.

The Legal Frame Around Every Bonus in New Zealand

The first thing any cost analysis has to settle is which offers exist lawfully. Otherwise the comparison compares apples to a closed market.

A monopoly, not a competitive licence regime

New Zealand is one of the few jurisdictions where betting is licensed by exclusion rather than by application. There is no register of bookmakers to apply for entry to, no whitelist to climb onto for offshore operators, and no second domestic licence class. The Racing Industry Act 2020 establishes TAB NZ as the provider of racing and sports betting, and the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025 inserted section 74AAA: no person other than TAB NZ may offer racing betting, sports betting or other racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person is resident or incorporated. The change took effect on 28 June 2025, and the Department of Internal Affairs told unlicensed providers serving New Zealand customers to withdraw with immediate effect. The penalty for breaching section 74AAA is not stated in the section and no prosecution of an offshore bookmaker has been published. The offshore operator is the one the law targets, not the player — section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003 (inserted in 2025) says an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore operator in breach of section 74AAA. DIA warns that overseas operators may sit in jurisdictions with minimal consumer safeguards, may not return unspent credits, and may not pay out large wins — but no published penalty for a player was found.

The greyhound-racing element closes in stages from 1 August 2026, and from that date offshore operators may not take bets on greyhound races either. The point-of-consumption charge that once applied to offshore racing and sports bets ceased on 30 June 2026.

TAB and Betcha are two brands of one operator

TAB NZ runs two online brands: TAB and Betcha. They are the same operator group, never rivals. Entain operates the business under a 25-year partnership signed in 2023 that gives Entain a 50/50 share of gross profits, with at least $150 million a year going to TAB NZ for the first five years; Entain also pledged a one-off $100 million payment to the racing sector. The structure matters for the bonus analysis that follows: there is no competition between domestic brands for sign-up value, so any “compete” or “best odds” framing between TAB and Betcha is a comparison of one operator against itself.

What may be bet on, and what is not licensed

The monopoly covers racing (thoroughbred, harness, greyhounds until closure) and sports. TAB NZ takes fixed-odds and tote bets. Its published betting rules cover Win, Place, Each Way, Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First Four, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6, plus Multis and Same Game Multis. The TAB NZ apps list live betting; any statutory restriction on in-play markets is not established. There is no lawful New Zealand betting exchange, and spread betting is outside TAB NZ’s sports-betting definition. Bets on politics and novelty markets are not established either.

A few adjacent items deserve to be ruled out, because each distorts the comparison if included:

• Online casino. The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 licenses online casino gambling only and does not license sports betting. TAB New Zealand has the right to apply for a casino licence; that right does not extend the betting monopoly. The online casino law also caps inducements at $100 / 200% — that cap is for licensed online casinos and does not govern betting bonuses.
• Esports and virtual sport. Whether esports betting is “sports betting” under the Racing Industry Act is not established. The 2026 online casino law treats virtual (computer-simulated) sport as casino gambling.
• Other NZ licences. No second betting licence class exists, and there is no licence register for bookmakers because there is only this one lawful provider. So the “is this brand licensed in New Zealand?” question has a binary answer for every brand outside TAB NZ — no.

Age, ID and address — who can claim a bonus at all

TAB NZ betting is an 18+ activity; land-based casinos are 20. TAB NZ accounts need a verified New Zealand address and ID. Opening a TAB NZ account from offshore using a VPN is not a route the operator offers; nothing in New Zealand law states a rule on crypto or VPN use, but account opening at TAB NZ requires a verified New Zealand address. Offshore accounts are opened under each offshore operator’s own rules — typically Curacao, Anjouan or Tobique licensing — which give no right to take bets from people in New Zealand. The cost analysis below treats any “bonus” claimed at such an account as a product the New Zealand player has no local recourse over if it goes wrong.

How TAB NZ’s “Bonus Cash” Terms Actually Cost the Punter

No New Zealand rule on bonus size or wagering terms was found. Every figure in this section comes only from TAB NZ’s own terms. The headline offer described in the TAB NZ app listing is Bonus Cash for new customers — a balance that can be split across multiple bets, with a Mega Multi Bonus of up to $50 in Bonus Cash when a multi of four or more legs falls short by a set number of legs.

What Bonus Cash is, in plain terms

Bonus Cash is a free-bet-style balance: the stake is not paid back with the winnings. That single condition is where the cost of the offer sits, and it is the one piece of mechanics the public framing tends to fold into the headline. A $50 Bonus Cash that lands is worth less than $50 in cash because the stake that produced the win is not returned. The arithmetic below in the free-bet-value band puts a number on the difference. Until that figure is read, no judgement about whether the offer is generous or thin can stand on the data the listing provides.

The Mega Multi Bonus

The Mega Multi Bonus is a partial-loss refund: if a multi of four or more legs misses by a small number of selections, the punter is credited a Bonus Cash amount of up to $50. It only triggers on multi bets; singles and two-leg multis never qualify. The exact “fall short by” gap and the qualifying minimum odds per leg are operator terms, not statutory ones — and they are the lines a punter needs to read before relying on the offer as a safety net.

What the tab.co.nz terms require, and what they don’t

Beyond Bonus Cash and the Mega Multi Bonus, TAB NZ runs rotating “bonus bets” promotions tied to specific events or bet types. Each carries its own terms: a minimum odds threshold on the qualifying bet, a deadline from when the credit hits the account, a list of markets where the Bonus Cash may or may not be used, and (in many cases) an exclusion from cash-out use. None of those qualifiers appears in any headline. They are exactly the qualifiers that decide whether an offer is generous or thin, and they have to be read off the operator’s own page before any bonus is taken.

What a Free or Bonus Bet Is Worth on Average

The following breakdown sets out the real-world value of these offers. The result is a band, not a single figure, because the price the bet is placed at is the one input the punter controls.

Inputs

• Nominal value: a $50 free or bonus bet (Bonus Cash or the Mega Multi Bonus top-up), the stake of which is not returned with the winnings.
• Illustrative market: a two-way price at decimal odds 1.90 / 1.90 — an example, not a quoted price, used so the math does not depend on any specific TAB NZ line.
• Assumed market margin: none stated here, because the calculation is a price-only comparison and the result is the same at any symmetrical two-way price.

The result, as a band

At 1.90, a winning $50 free bet returns $95 (stake $50 × odds 1.90), of which only the $45 profit is paid out — the $50 stake stays on the operator’s side. The implied worth of the $50 Bonus Cash at a fair two-way price is roughly 45/1.90 × the payout share of that market, which works out to about $23.70 at zero margin. At realistic margins on a 1.90/1.90 book (roughly 5%), the figure sits closer to $22.50. The honest reading is a band from about $22.50 to $23.70 per $50 of Bonus Cash at a flat 1.90/1.90 price, narrower at bigger odds and wider at shorter prices.

Why the band matters more than a single number

A punter who treats the headline $50 as the offer’s worth is overpaying the operator roughly $26.50 to $27.50 per $50 of Bonus Cash before a single dollar of their own has touched the bet. That gap is not a rounding error, and it does not close when the offer is “bigger” — it scales, because the stake-not-returned condition is the same on a $10 token and a $500 one. The thickness of the offer is set by the odds the punter finds and the markets the token may be used on, not by the dollar figure at the top.

Where the calculation breaks

The band holds for two-way markets at a single fixed price. For each-way bets, where part of the stake is returned at a fraction of the win odds, the calculation has to be split leg by leg. For Same Game Multis, where legs multiply into one price, the leg prices are multiplied before the stake-not-returned adjustment is applied. For live or in-play offers where the credit must be used within a short window, the realised value commonly falls below the band because the punter cannot wait for the price to move in their favour. None of this changes the headline point — the stake is not paid back — but each one widens the gap between the headline figure and the realised value.

Safer Gambling Tools, Levies and Where a Punter Gets Help

A bonus analysis that ignores the harm-minimisation frame around the offer is missing half its cost. The frame is what catches the punter when the marketing has done its job too well.

Tools in the TAB NZ and Betcha apps

Both TAB NZ apps list deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion. A self-exclusion applies across both TAB and Betcha — they are the same operator, and the exclusion is at the operator level. A punter who hits a deposit limit on TAB has hit it on Betcha, which is part of why these tools exist at the operator level rather than the product level. The tools are free to set, and the limits apply immediately, with adjustments subject to the operator’s own cool-down or review process.

Help outside the app

The free Gambling Helpline (0800 654 655) and the text line 8006 are listed in both the TAB and Betcha app descriptions. Safer Gambling Aotearoa is the national service. The Betcha app carries a 17+ App Store age rating; TAB and Betcha age gate at 18 by law.

Levies and what they fund

TAB NZ pays a Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74% of its gross proceeds, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028. The levy funds prevention, treatment and public-health work. Offshore operators supplying New Zealand residents pay online gambling duty — 12% of profits since 1 July 2024, rising to 16% from 1 January 2027. Operator-side tax is not a sign of legality for an offer; it is the cost of doing business in that market and tells the punter nothing about whether the offer sits inside or outside the New Zealand frame.

Tax on the punter

Inland Revenue guidance says recreational gambling winnings are generally not taxable in New Zealand, and prize money from TAB horse, dog and trotting races is not taxable. A person who bets as a business is a different case and falls under ordinary income tax rules. None of that changes what a Bonus Cash offer is worth, but it removes one of the more common “I’ll owe tax on this” assumptions that distort punter-side cost estimates.

How the Top Ten Brands Stack Up Against the Same Cost Test

The first two brands below are the only lawful domestic options. The remaining eight are offshore brands New Zealand players meet in advertising and on comparison sites; each is marked “not licensed in New Zealand” and the comparison below is offered so a punter can see the distinction.

Primer — what to read in this table

The table that follows covers three matters: the brand, the New Zealand legal status, and what each operator’s own terms say on the offer-type the comparison is built around (free-bet stake-return terms, where the operator is a TAB NZ brand; sportsbook welcome bonus structure, where it is not). A column is added for the wagering or minimum-price terms that govern the offer where the operator publishes them. The view the table provides is what an operator says about itself — not what a regulator says about it.

Reading the table

The legal status column is the one a New Zealand punter cannot negotiate. Every row below TAB and Betcha carries the same status: not licensed in New Zealand, no New Zealand complaints route, and no recourse to the Department of Internal Affairs if a withdrawal, a bonus dispute or a limit dispute goes wrong. The bonus column shows what each operator advertises; the wagering column shows the part of the offer that decides whether the headline figure has any relationship to the realised value. For TAB and Betcha, those numbers are the same because the products are the same.

Two Brands of One Operator: TAB and Betcha

TAB and Betcha are not a comparison of two competing bookmakers. They are two channels for the same operator, and the question of which to use is a product question, not a regulatory one.

TAB

TAB is the original domestic brand — the retail counters, the racing-first heritage and the app that grew out of them. Its current product set runs the full TAB NZ range: Win, Place, Each Way, Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First Four, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6 on racing, plus Multis on sports and Same Game Multis. Same Race Multis combine legs from a single race, and one-tap Popular Multis surface curated combinations the punter can place in a single tap. Place Extra lets punters back runners to finish up to the top 10 in selected races.

For the bonus analysis, TAB’s Bonus Cash is the headline offer, with the Mega Multi Bonus of up to $50 covering the gap when a multi misses narrowly. The cost frame is the band described above — about $22.50 to $23.70 per $50 of Bonus Cash at a flat 1.90/1.90 price, narrower at bigger odds. Worth the punt if the punter was going to place that multi anyway; indifferent or poor value if the Bonus Cash draws the punter to a bet they do not otherwise intend to place.

Betcha

Betcha is the new-format app aimed at a younger, social punter. Same TAB NZ bonus framework on the credit side, different product packaging. The Multi Builder lets the punter build a multi from scratch, copy trending multis from other users, and track live legs, with a new multi-grid building Same Game Multis. The daily Toolbox contains odds boosts and insurance tools — partial refunds on bets that do not land, in Bonus Cash, subject to the same stake-not-returned condition. Bet Social is the social layer: punters chat, follow tipsters and share bets or pools. The Playbook bundles tips and match analysis.

The cost frame is identical to TAB’s: same Bonus Cash, same Mega Multi, same stake-not-returned condition. Betcha is worth choosing over TAB if the punter prefers the social feed, the Multi Builder UI and the daily Toolbox packaging, and indifferent otherwise. The two apps are interoperable for harm-minimisation tools: a deposit limit set on one applies across both.

Eight Offshore Brands New Zealand Players Meet

These brands appear in marketing aimed at New Zealand and in comparison sites that do not filter for jurisdiction. None is licensed to take bets from a person in New Zealand, which is the first cost the table above ought to print. Each is described below for what its own site says it offers, and rated on the same cost criterion — what the bonus is worth versus what it costs.

LegendPlay

LegendPlay lists five sports promotions by name: First Deposit Bonus, Weekly Reload Bonus, Sport Jackpot, Virtual Sports Excitement and Acca Boost. The mix is dense — five concurrent offers is more than the typical offshore bookmaker publishes — and that density is itself a sign the product is built around promotional throughput rather than a settled book. The Anjouan licence carries no New Zealand consumer standing, and no New Zealand complaints route reaches an Anjouan holder. The cost is the typical offshore one: a generous-sounding headline, a wagering multiple and minimum-odds terms in the fine print that determine realised value, and no local recourse if a withdrawal is held or a bonus is voided.

22Bet

22Bet’s product is depth, not novelty — over 30 market types per event, including 1X2, Double Chance, totals, both teams to score, correct score, HT-FT plus tennis game, set and handicap markets. A punter comparing bookmakers on market coverage alone may place 22Bet at or near the top of an offshore list. The Curaçao licence (8048/JAZ), held by TechSolutions Group N.V., gives no right to take bets from people in New Zealand. The bonus framing is the standard non-NZ welcome package, with terms tied to the Curaçao licence regime. Worth the punt for a New Zealand bettor if and only if that bettor has decided the offshore path is the one they are taking, with full awareness of the no-local-recourse cost.

Telbet

Telbet brands itself as a crypto casino and sportsbook. The headline offer is steep by offshore standards: 200% up to 1 BTC plus 50 free spins, with a 5 USDT free bet on the Russian-language site. The sportsbook offers in-play betting and a My Bets page, and the operator publishes separate sports betting rules, bonus terms and responsible-gambling and AML policies. The crypto denomination is the headline’s draw — BTC and USDT pricing means the bonus value floats with the asset. The risk for a New Zealand punter is the no-local-recourse cost amplified by the volatility of the bonus asset itself, and by the absence of any document on Telbet’s site showing that New Zealand residents are within the operator’s intended customer base. Each brand on this list carries the same offshore-licensing status.

Roobet

Roobet is one of the better-known crypto-first brands, run by Raw Entertainment B.V. (registration number 157205, Korporaalweg 10, Curacao) under Curaçao licence OGL/2024/687/0427. The product is crypto-casino-first with a sportsbook attached. The bonus structure is built around the crypto model rather than the matched-deposit model used by most fiat bookmakers, which means the realised value depends on the asset chosen at deposit. The Curaçao licence gives no right to take bets from people in New Zealand, and Roobet’s terms name a Curaçao-governed dispute process. The cost is the same as for every other brand listed here.

Rabona

Rabona launched on 23 December 2019 as the sixth online sportsbook of the Soft2Bet group. The group pedigree is the brand’s strongest selling point: a stable, multi-brand operator with a Curaçao licence and a settled product. The welcome bonus and reload suite target Curaçao-licensed markets, not New Zealand. The cost for a New Zealand punter is the standard one: no local regulator, no local complaints route, and any dispute handled under Curaçao law by a Curaçao-licensed operator, providing no local standing for the punter.

Rooster.bet

Rooster.bet is operated by Novatrix SRL, a company incorporated in Costa Rica with registration number 3-102-893958, under e-gaming licence No. 0000002 issued by the Tobique Gaming Commission. The Tobique licence is one of the newer regulatory frameworks and is not widely understood outside the operator’s own markets. For a New Zealand punter, the licensing body’s dispute process is not New Zealand-based and offers no recourse under New Zealand consumer law. The bonus suite is published on the operator’s terms page. The product positioning is a sportsbook with a casino attached; the realised value of the bonus depends on the wagering terms that apply.

Golden Panda

Golden Panda positions itself as a one-account casino and sportsbook: casino, live casino, crash games, sports, esports, virtual sports, rewards, cashback, a VIP Club, Golden Goals and Prediction Markets. The product range is wide; the regulatory standing under New Zealand law is none. The brand names no licence that applies in New Zealand. The cost frame for a New Zealand punter is identical to the others — a generous-sounding product that lacks local standing or any form of local recourse.

RTbet

RTbet has a small but specific published detail: minimum bet per event is 0.5 in the customer account’s currency, with multi-bets and system bets capped at 30 selections. The caps matter for any cost analysis: a 30-leg system bet ceiling means the operator is willing to accept very large combinational tickets within its published limits, which (combined with a low minimum) tells the punter the product is built for volume rather than high-stake singles. The Curaçao licence gives no right to take bets from people in New Zealand. The bonus suite sits on top of the sportsbook. Same “not licensed in New Zealand” cost.

The Bonuses & Free Bets Cluster: Where the Cost Actually Sits

This section gathers the cluster the page is built around — the offers themselves — into a single framework the punter can apply to any brand, domestic or offshore.

Where the headline comes from

Every sign-up offer or free bet is built from two moves: a credit to the punter (Bonus Cash, a free bet token, free spins, odds boosts, insurance) and a set of constraints on how that credit may be converted into withdrawable cash. The credit is the headline figure and is what the marketing is selling. The constraints are where the cost lives. The single most common constraint across TAB NZ, LegendPlay, 22Bet, Telbet, Roobet and every other brand on this list is that the stake of a free or bonus bet is not returned with the winnings. That single condition shifts a $50 bonus from a $50 headline to roughly a $22.50–$23.70 realised value at a flat 1.90/1.90 price, as the band above shows.

Where the cost compounds

A wagering multiple is the second common constraint — a requirement to bet the bonus amount a certain number of times before any withdrawal is permitted. The market context for that multiple is critical: a 5x multiple on a low-margin market (totals, handicaps) clears cheaper than the same 5x on a high-margin market (exotic props, novelty bets). The third is a minimum odds requirement on each qualifying bet. The fourth is a deadline from when the credit is issued, after which the credit expires. None of these appears in any headline. All of them are the lines that decide the realised cost.

What the cluster cannot tell the punter

Some constraints cannot be inferred from the public page. The exact minimum odds on a TAB NZ Bonus Cash qualifying bet, the maximum winnings cap on a free bet at LegendPlay, the qualifying market list on a 22Bet reload — these are operator-level facts that change with the promotion and have to be read on the operator’s own terms page before the bonus is claimed. The cluster above names the cost category. The realised cost per dollar of bonus requires reading the terms.

The cluster’s most useful single test

For any offer, divide the headline credit by the realised value per dollar. At TAB NZ’s current Bonus Cash framing, the implicit multiple is roughly 2.1x to 2.2x of the headline number before the bonus is fully realised — the stake-not-returned condition does the work. A wagering multiple of 5x on the same Bonus Cash compounds to a total cost closer to 10x–11x of the headline before any punter-side cents come back. That is the offer-level test the cluster supports, and it is the one to apply to any brand in the table above.

The Overview: What the New Zealand Bonus Landscape Looks Like in 2026

Bringing the clusters together, the landscape for a New Zealand punter in 2026 has a specific shape. This guide focuses on describing that landscape rather than offering a marketing comparison.

One lawful domestic operator, two brands, one bonus framework

The lawful side is TAB NZ, with TAB and Betcha as its two online brands. The bonus framework is Bonus Cash (stake not returned), a Mega Multi Bonus of up to $50 (also Bonus Cash, with the same stake treatment), and rotating daily Toolbox offers at Betcha. That is the set. There is no second domestic bonus to compare it to, and the comparison sites that print “top 10 New Zealand betting bonuses” are listing, almost entirely, offshore brands that are not licensed to take bets from people in New Zealand.

Offshore brands, in their actual licensing

The offshore brands are licensed under Curaçao (22Bet, Roobet, Rabona, RTbet), Anjouan (LegendPlay) or Tobique (Rooster.bet). Some name no licence that applies in New Zealand at all (Telbet, Golden Panda). Each is described above as its own site states it, with no claim that any of them is licensed in New Zealand. The cost for the punter is the lack of any New Zealand complaints route or harm-minimisation framework reaching them, and DIA’s stated warning that overseas operators may not pay out large wins or return unspent credits.

The bookkeeping the punter needs to keep

For any offer — domestic or offshore, Bonus Cash or free bet or matched deposit — the realised value per dollar of credit sits inside a band set by the price the bet is placed at and the stake-return condition. For TAB NZ’s Bonus Cash at 1.90/1.90, that band sits at about $0.45 to $0.47 of realised value per dollar of nominal value. The headline figure is the marketing number. The figure that matters is the one in the realised-value band, after the terms have been read and the qualifying conditions satisfied.

Frequently Asked Questions About Betting Bonuses in New Zealand

Are there New Zealand rules on the size or terms of a betting bonus?

No New Zealand rule on bonus size or wagering terms for betting was found. The only statutory caps in the gambling frame — the Online Casino Gambling Act 2026’s $100 / 200% inducement limit — apply to licensed online casinos, not to sports or racing betting. Every figure on a betting bonus in New Zealand is set by the operator’s own terms, and the only domestic operator setting those terms is TAB NZ.

Why is the stake of a free or bonus bet not paid back with the winnings?

Because that is how a free bet is defined at TAB NZ and across most offshore bookmakers. A free or bonus bet credits the punter with the profit share of a winning bet but does not credit the stake. At a 1.90/1.90 price, a $50 free bet pays out $45 in profit, not the $95 a $50 cash stake earns. The condition is the operator’s, not the punter’s choice, and the cost is a roughly 50–55% reduction in the realised value of the credit versus treating the nominal dollar figure as cash.

Which bookmakers may lawfully take sports and racing bets in New Zealand?

TAB NZ, through its two online brands TAB and Betcha. Section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020, in force since 28 June 2025, makes this the case. The Department of Internal Affairs told unlicensed providers serving New Zealand customers to withdraw with immediate effect. There is no licensing route for another bookmaker.

How is the return on a bet worked out from the stake and the odds?

For a single bet, return equals stake multiplied by decimal odds, and net profit equals stake multiplied by (odds − 1). For a combination bet, the odds of the legs multiply into one price, and the same return formula applies to the multiplied price. A free or bonus bet takes the profit portion of that return only — the stake is not returned, so a $50 free bet at 1.90 returns $45 profit, not $95.

Which tools for controlling play do TAB and Betcha offer, and who can be called for help?

Both TAB and Betcha list deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion in their apps, with the exclusion applying across both brands. The free Gambling Helpline (0800 654 655) and the text line 8006 are listed in both apps; Safer Gambling Aotearoa is the national service. The Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74%, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028, funds prevention and treatment work.

What does a punter lose by betting with a bookmaker that has no New Zealand licence?

The punter loses the New Zealand complaints route, the New Zealand harm-minimisation framework, and the protection the Department of Internal Affairs provides through its oversight of TAB NZ. DIA warns that overseas operators may not return unspent credits and may not pay out large wins; whether they do or not depends entirely on the operator’s own house rules. New Zealand law targets the offshore operator, not the player, but no published penalty for a player was found in the legislation reviewed.

Prepared by the Nzsolebookie editorial staff.